Professional Football Researchers Association Forum

Believe it or not SeahawkFever I agree 100% that Cromwell accolades are more impressive than Meador's and for that reason I'd go Cromwell over meador

of the ones you have listed in yellow john how many of them have legit hof cases

The fallout of that class is still hard to believe. At least had Dilweg and Wistert been elected, it would have been much better. I still remember our Gold Panel selections that Clark Judge did on TOFN ... some great players I would also add emerson to that list of people that should have been elec...

Brian wolf wrote: ↑Fri Mar 01, 2024 1:40 am Lynch is eligible in 2025, Robert ...

Oh OK

Can we please move on from 2024 voting brian

100% agreed with you as always john im glad we can have a conversation and not argue at all what you said about powell and 60-62 was the main reason he didnt get in

As I understand it the level of competition for Powell's big seasons was part of reason for rejection people here know but visually it's interesting anyway---there is more overlap that maybe younger voters cared to look up. Maybe 1960-62 ... sure, there is some validity to it ... and beyond but if ...

For some reason I've always been a Chiefs fan (or at least I've never had anything against them) and I never liked Marty Schottenheimer. Carl Peterson - I seem to recall hearing about what a good job he did in the USFL - I think for the Baltimore/Philadelphia Stars - and I feel like he did a good j...

My thoughts : the class got in some players that I thought were very deserving and some after some research they could have gone in a better direction with at least one of them Ed Sprinkle I would have gone with Emerson or Dilweg In terms of covert I have little to no issue with him, belichick saw h...

That was the same exact thing I was thinking john some voters prob brought up both otis and lionel taylor and said why is powell being consider before lionel and otis