Rumor are just that, so take with grain of salt

Discuss candidates for the Pro Football Hall of Fame and the PFRA's Hall of Very Good
User avatar
TanksAndSpartans
Posts: 1153
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2015 1:05 am

Re: Rumor are just that, so take with grain of salt

Post by TanksAndSpartans »

Dilweg is one of four official PFRA supported HOF senior candidates and I've always agreed with that choice. Not sure the right way to say this, but I just feel Dilweg is more of a slight at his position - I think he pretty easily passes as a top-4 two-way end, whereas I think you have to go deeper to get to Lewellen as a two-way HB.
JameisLoseston
Posts: 391
Joined: Wed Oct 16, 2019 12:39 am

Re: Rumor are just that, so take with grain of salt

Post by JameisLoseston »

TanksAndSpartans wrote:Dilweg is one of four official PFRA supported HOF senior candidates and I've always agreed with that choice. Not sure the right way to say this, but I just feel Dilweg is more of a slight at his position - I think he pretty easily passes as a top-4 two-way end, whereas I think you have to go deeper to get to Lewellen as a two-way HB.
Judging by his INT totals, Dilweg appears to have been mainly a defensive back, not an end. Hutson also played split end and D back. If he really was a DE, then oh my God his picks are impressive. Imagine a guy having 5 INTs and like 10+ sacks per season these days. But this seems farfetched.

Lewellen seems to me to have been the best running back of the 20s as far as career output is concerned (Nevers too short), and he certainly had his moments on defense (9 recorded INTs as a rookie). Dilweg did comparatively little on offense; wouldn't say he was the best pass catching end of the 20s, that'd be Johnny Blood. So we'd essentially be inducting a primarily defensive player from the 20s, and that's a bold strategy, Cotton.

Again, if Dilweg was a DE his ballhawking is beyond ridiculous and makes him HOF worthy on its own, but assuming he wasn't (it can't be, right?!), the top 5 two-way ends are definitely Hutson, Pihos, Hewitt, Benton, and Blood, in whatever order you wish. I'd actually have an easier time ranking Lewellen as a top 5 HB because of all the TDs and HBs tended to have short careers, which he did not.
User avatar
Ken Crippen
Site Moderator
Posts: 529
Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2014 8:10 am
Location: Here
Contact:

Re: Rumor are just that, so take with grain of salt

Post by Ken Crippen »

JameisLoseston wrote:
TanksAndSpartans wrote:Dilweg is one of four official PFRA supported HOF senior candidates and I've always agreed with that choice. Not sure the right way to say this, but I just feel Dilweg is more of a slight at his position - I think he pretty easily passes as a top-4 two-way end, whereas I think you have to go deeper to get to Lewellen as a two-way HB.
Judging by his INT totals, Dilweg appears to have been mainly a defensive back, not an end. Hutson also played split end and D back. If he really was a DE, then oh my God his picks are impressive. Imagine a guy having 5 INTs and like 10+ sacks per season these days. But this seems farfetched.

Lewellen seems to me to have been the best running back of the 20s as far as career output is concerned (Nevers too short), and he certainly had his moments on defense (9 recorded INTs as a rookie). Dilweg did comparatively little on offense; wouldn't say he was the best pass catching end of the 20s, that'd be Johnny Blood. So we'd essentially be inducting a primarily defensive player from the 20s, and that's a bold strategy, Cotton.

Again, if Dilweg was a DE his ballhawking is beyond ridiculous and makes him HOF worthy on its own, but assuming he wasn't (it can't be, right?!), the top 5 two-way ends are definitely Hutson, Pihos, Hewitt, Benton, and Blood, in whatever order you wish. I'd actually have an easier time ranking Lewellen as a top 5 HB because of all the TDs and HBs tended to have short careers, which he did not.
Dilweg lined up in the DE position.
Football Learning Academy: https://www.football-learning-academy.com
An online school teaching football history.

FLA Podcast: https://www.football-learning-academy.com/pages/podcast
Bob Gill
Posts: 559
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2014 7:16 pm

Re: Rumor are just that, so take with grain of salt

Post by Bob Gill »

JameisLoseston wrote:... the top 5 two-way ends are definitely Hutson, Pihos, Hewitt, Benton, and Blood, in whatever order you wish.

Blood was a halfback, not an end.
User avatar
TanksAndSpartans
Posts: 1153
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2015 1:05 am

Re: Rumor are just that, so take with grain of salt

Post by TanksAndSpartans »

JameisLoseston wrote:... the top 5 two-way ends are definitely Hutson, Pihos, Hewitt, Benton, and Blood, in whatever order you wish.
My 4 would be Chamberlin, Dilweg, Hewitt, and Hutson. With Hutson the least well-rounded - GB was happy to get a player they could put at End so Hutson could play DB. Obviously, what he did on offense makes up for a lot and he deserves to be NFL top 100, etc. I'm just saying he wasn't known for defense. Don't forget Pihos played offense and defense in different seasons. There were players playing both ways into the 50s, but given the new substitution rules, I'm hesitant to count those players as two-way players. The 75th Anniversary team disagreed with me on this though.

I think you are way underselling Dilewg with your "stats first" approach. Here are some links on Dilweg:

http://www.profootballresearchers.org/a ... 03-259.pdf

http://www.profootballresearchers.org/L ... _Sheet.pdf

http://www.footballresearch.com/article ... retro.html
Last edited by TanksAndSpartans on Wed Nov 27, 2019 12:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
JameisLoseston
Posts: 391
Joined: Wed Oct 16, 2019 12:39 am

Re: Rumor are just that, so take with grain of salt

Post by JameisLoseston »

Yeah, if he was a primary DE, then I was absolutely underselling him. Coming away with 5-7 INTs a year like he was, at the end position (and that's only the ones we know of!) is absolutely savage, and is something I never could have thought was possible on a consistent basis. What in the world was he doing to be able to pick off so many balls?! Usually a DE getting a pick is pretty fluky, like a tipped pass going to them, but he was doing it on the regular. This takes "all over the field" to a new level, and definitely meets the criterion of historic uniqueness that truly seals a HOF case. He feels like another one of those "didn't get in sooner because the stats just weren't available" guys, like Friedman. Was he the greatest defensive player of the whole two-way era in our opinion? I can't think of anyone who's credited with doing anything quite so impressive.
Oszuscik
Posts: 169
Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2019 2:34 pm

Re: Rumor are just that, so take with grain of salt

Post by Oszuscik »

The Packers' team historian Cliff Christl made a strong case for Lewellen here:

https://www.packers.com/news/verne-lewe ... n-20381335

Pretty convincing as far as I'm concerned.
Post Reply